“Just ignore them” is probably the most common thing a parent says when a child comes inside upset because a friend walked off mid-game, or a group at the park kept building without them, or a sibling would not answer when they asked to join in. It is well-meant advice. It is also worth checking against what the research on children and peer exclusion actually suggests, because the picture is more specific than the phrase implies.
Being ignored and being disliked are not the same thing
One useful distinction from the research on children’s peer relationships is between kids who are actively disliked by their peer group and kids who are simply overlooked, present but not sought out. In a 1985 study in Child Development, the researchers Doran French and Gregory Waas drew from a larger group of elementary-age children and compared parent and teacher ratings of behavior across children sorted into rejected, neglected, popular, and average peer-status groups. Rejected children, meaning kids the group actively avoided, showed meaningfully more behavior problems on these ratings than neglected children did. Neglected children, the ones simply not included rather than pushed away, did not differ much from average-status kids at all.
This is one study, from 1985, not a settled account of every child’s experience today, and it looked at broad behavior ratings rather than any child’s internal experience of being ignored. But the distinction is a genuinely useful one for a parent to hold onto. A child who is regularly excluded on purpose by a specific group is a different situation from a child who simply was not picked for a particular game on a particular afternoon. The second situation is common, normal, and not evidence that something is wrong with the child, even though it can feel exactly the same in the moment it happens.
The Artful Age
A weekly letter on aging well, family across generations, and the creative life after the kids leave home.
Why “just ignore them” is not quite the whole answer
A more direct test of coping advice comes from a 2002 study in Developmental Psychology, in which the researchers Becky Kochenderfer-Ladd and Kimberly Skinner looked at how children’s own coping strategies related to how their peer difficulties played out over time. Coping strategies built around avoiding the situation, downplaying it, or pretending it did not happen were linked to peer difficulties continuing or getting worse over time, particularly for children who were already dealing with ongoing peer problems rather than a single one-off incident.
This is one study, not a rule for every child in every situation, and it does not mean ignoring a single ignored moment is harmful. A child who shrugs off being left out of one game and moves on is doing something completely reasonable. What the research complicates is the idea that quietly ignoring an ongoing pattern is itself the fix. For a child dealing with the same group leaving them out repeatedly, ignoring it as a standing strategy is the part this research suggests may not be doing what parents hope it does.
What seems to help more, according to research done with adults
Here it is worth being honest about the limits of the evidence. Some of the clearest research on what actually helps after social exclusion was done with adults, not children, and should not be quietly assumed to transfer. In a 2007 study in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, the researchers Jon Maner, C. Nathan DeWall, Roy Baumeister, and Mark Schaller ran six experiments and found that people who experienced social exclusion did not respond by trying to win back the specific people who excluded them. Instead, excluded participants showed a stronger pull toward making new connections entirely, forming more favorable impressions of new potential friends and expressing more interest in working with people they had not met before.
This is adult experimental research, not a study of children on a playground, and the honest reading is that it suggests a direction rather than proves it works the same way for a seven-year-old. But it lines up with something a lot of parents already do instinctively: when a child is stuck feeling excluded by one specific group, redirecting energy toward a different friend, a different activity, or a different setting altogether tends to feel more useful than staying focused on winning back the group that did the excluding.
What this suggests for the moment it actually happens
Put together, this research points to something a little more specific than “ignore them.” The first useful question is not how to respond, but what actually happened: was this a child being actively excluded by a particular group over time, or was this an ordinary, forgettable mismatch, not picked for one game on one day? The second is a matter of degree. Brushing off a single moment is a reasonable, low-stakes response that most children manage fine. Treating ongoing exclusion the same way, as something to just quietly absorb and move past without addressing it, is the part this research is more skeptical of.
Where the adult research offers something real, it is in the direction it points rather than a guarantee: helping a child find another game, another friend, or another setting where they are genuinely wanted seems more promising than coaching them to keep circling back to a group that is not including them. None of this is a script, and no single study here was designed to tell a parent exactly what to say in the specific moment a child walks in the door upset. It is a normal, recurring part of childhood, worth taking seriously without turning it into something to worry over every time it happens.