The phrase “back in my day” has never once been about the past. Every time your boomer parent launches into a story about working two jobs at seventeen or surviving on canned soup through college, they’re reaching into their chest and pulling out the only thing that ever helped them get through hard seasons: the belief that if they endured worse and survived, you can too. They’re handing you a tool. And when you respond with frustration or silence, what they experience is bewildering. Because from where they stand, they just offered you the thing that saved their life. And you looked at it like it was a weapon.
The Tool They Were Given
My dad grew up on a farm where complaining about anything meant more chores. His mother, my grandmother, raised four kids with a husband who worked sixty-hour weeks and a kitchen that didn’t have a dishwasher until 1978. The emotional vocabulary in that house was small and functional: you’re fine, get over it, could be worse. And when my dad tells me those stories now, when he watches me navigate a hard week with Ellie and Milo and starts with “well, when I was your age,” I’ve started hearing something underneath the words. He’s saying: This is what I used to survive. Please take it. I don’t know what else to give you.
That reframe took me years to reach. For a long time, I heard dismissal. I heard comparison. I heard a man telling me my struggles didn’t matter because his were bigger. And sometimes, honestly, it still lands that way. But understanding what’s underneath his words has changed how I respond to them, even when the sting is still there.
Research on intergenerational transmission of trauma helps explain why: overwhelming experiences that were never processed into a meaningful narrative get passed along not as wisdom but as unexamined reflexes. My dad didn’t sit down and decide that minimizing pain was a great parenting strategy. He absorbed it. The same way I absorbed my mother’s anxiety about being a good enough homemaker, the same way Ellie is absorbing things from me right now that I probably can’t see yet.
The Eight Phrases That Travel Like Inheritance
There are certain phrases that move through families across generations, phrases most parents say without cruelty, often without even thinking. Things like “you’re too sensitive,” “I sacrifice everything for you,” and “stop crying or I’ll give you something to cry about.” What strikes me is that these phrases aren’t evidence of bad parenting. They’re evidence of inherited parenting. The parent who says them almost certainly heard them first.
Phrases like “stop crying or I’ll give you something to cry about” tend to produce a very specific kind of adult: someone who learned early that showing pain was dangerous. Not because anyone explained it, but because every time they cried, what came back was a threat instead of comfort. So they swallowed it. They got good at performing okayness. And the feeling didn’t disappear. It went underground. It waited.
That’s the tool. That going-still, that swallowing. That’s what a whole generation was handed in kitchens and cars and bedrooms across the country. And when they hand it to us now as adults, they’re not trying to hurt us. They genuinely believe it works. Because for them, in a certain survival sense, it did.

Why We Keep Handing It Back
Here’s what I think happens in the gap between generations. My dad offers me toughness. I hand it back and ask for empathy instead. He doesn’t understand what I’m asking for because no one ever offered it to him. And I don’t understand why he keeps offering something that feels like it erases my experience.
We’re both exhausted. We’re both unseen. Writers on this site have explored how this generational exhaustion shows up on both sides of the conversation, and I think that framing is exactly right.
When I tell my dad I’m overwhelmed and he responds with a story about hauling hay bales at fourteen, the translation breakdown looks like this: He means, You are strong enough to handle this because I was strong enough to handle worse. I hear, Your pain doesn’t count because mine was bigger. Same sentence, two entirely different messages depending on which side of the generational line you’re standing on.
Developmental research suggests that phrases like “you’re too sensitive” don’t toughen a child up. They teach the child that their feelings are the problem, not what caused them. And that lesson, repeated enough times, becomes the voice they use on themselves for the rest of their life. I wrote about this recently when exploring how words spoken before age five become the soundtrack of their entire emotional life, and studies keep confirming what parents intuitively sense: children record everything, especially the casual stuff.
Related Stories from The Artful Parent
- I’m 74 and I’ve accepted that my children love me but don’t actually miss me—and understanding the difference between those two things has been the most clarifying and painful lesson of my seventies
- Quote of the day by Maya Angelou: I sustain myself with the love of family—and psychology says this one sentence reveals why boomers who built their identity around family often struggle most when adult children need space
- Most boomers don’t realize the reason their adult children parent so differently isn’t rejection of their values—it’s that this generation is parenting with resources of time, therapy, and emotional vocabulary that simply didn’t exist in the 1980s
The Cost of the Only Tool You Have
My mom told me something a few months ago that I haven’t been able to shake. We were sitting on my porch while the kids played in the backyard, and she said, almost off-handedly, “I just didn’t know you were allowed to be sad about things when people had it harder.” She said it like she was reporting the weather. Like it was simply a fact of the world she grew up in.
And I realized: that’s the tool. Not comparison as a weapon, but comparison as the only available pain management. If someone else had it worse and survived, then what you’re feeling can’t be that bad. Therefore you can keep going. Therefore you’re fine.
It’s a coping mechanism built entirely on suppression. And research on how childhood adversity shapes the brain suggests that early environments where emotional expression was shut down don’t just affect personality; they affect neurological development itself. The architecture gets built around the absence of emotional processing, not the presence of it.
This approach produces a very particular kind of adult: someone who goes completely numb for long stretches, then falls apart over something small. A door closed too hard. A certain tone of voice. A force that makes no sense until you trace it back to a child who learned that showing pain was dangerous. My dad is that person. I think a lot of our parents are.

What Changes When You See the Offering
I want to be clear: seeing the intention behind my dad’s words doesn’t mean I have to accept the tool. I can understand that he’s offering me the best thing he has and still say, gently, that I need something different. Both things can be true. Understanding the offering doesn’t obligate me to use it.
But it does change the conversation. When I stopped hearing “back in my day” as an attack and started hearing it as an attempt at connection, something softened between us. Not perfectly. Not every time. But enough.
- I’m 65 and I keep buying books I’ll never read and signing up for classes I’ll never attend because the act of planning a future feels like proof I still have one and the moment I stop pretending to be interested in tomorrow is the moment I’ll have to face what I’m avoiding about today - Global English Editing
- Psychology says the most damaging sentence a parent can repeat isn’t an insult or a criticism, it’s “after everything I’ve done for you” — because it converts every act of love into a transaction and teaches the child that gratitude isn’t a feeling, it’s a debt, and that closeness will always come with an invoice they can never fully pay - Global English Editing
- Psychology says the reason some people walk while they talk on the phone, stand during meetings, or clean while listening to podcasts isn’t distraction — their brains literally process verbal information more effectively when their bodies are in motion - Global English Editing
There’s a quiet grief in realizing that your parent’s love language was forged in environments that didn’t allow for tenderness. My dad doesn’t know how to say “I see you’re hurting and I’m here.” What he knows how to say is “I went through something similar and I made it.” The message underneath both sentences is the same: You’re going to be okay. The delivery is just wildly different.
Instead of phrases like “you’re too sensitive,” we can try: “I can see this upset you. Tell me about it.” Instead of “stop crying or I’ll give you something to cry about,” we can try: “It’s okay. I’m right here.” Five words, and something in the child gets to stay above ground.
Breaking the Cycle Without Breaking the Bond
Last week, Ellie came to me crying because her block tower fell and Milo knocked over the pieces she was trying to rebuild. A small thing. A nothing thing, in the scope of real problems. And I felt it rise in me, fast and familiar: It’s just blocks. You’re fine. When I was your age I didn’t even have that many toys.
I heard it in my dad’s voice first, and then in mine. The tool, reaching for me across the generational line.
I sat down on the floor instead. “I can see this upset you. Tell me about it.”
She did. For four minutes. About the tower and the colors she’d chosen and how Milo always does this and it isn’t fair. And by the end she was fine. Not because I minimized her pain, but because I let it move through her instead of teaching her to push it underground.
The cycle doesn’t break by accident. It breaks when someone stops, notices, and chooses a different sentence. Not perfectly, not every time, but enough that the child starts to hear something different. And slowly that becomes the voice they carry instead.
I think about my dad and the voice he carries. The one that says could be worse, keep going, don’t complain. He didn’t choose that voice. It was installed in him before he had any say in the matter. And when he tries to install it in me, or in Ellie, he’s doing the only thing he knows how to do with love.
I don’t have to accept the tool. But I can stop being angry at the person offering it. Because the grief of breaking a cycle runs in both directions. He loses something when I parent differently than he did. He hears, even if I never say it, that what he gave me wasn’t enough. And that has to hurt in a way I’m only beginning to understand.
So I hold both things. I choose different words with my kids. And I try, on the best days, to hear what my dad is actually saying underneath the stories about walking to school in the snow. He’s saying: I love you. I survived. You will too.
He’s just saying it in the only language he was ever taught.
