I was raised in the 60s by a woman who cooked every meal from scratch, never read a parenting book, and solved every childhood crisis with “you’ll be fine” — and the terrifying part is that she was right almost every time

by Tony Moorcroft
March 19, 2026

My mother never once consulted a parenting book.

I’m not sure she knew they existed.

She raised four children in a terraced house in the north of England, cooked every meal from scratch on a budget that didn’t have much margin, and operated according to a philosophy that could be summarised in about four words: get on with it.

When I fell off my bike and came in bleeding at the knee, she cleaned it, covered it, and said you’ll be fine.

When I didn’t get picked for the school football team and moped around the house for a week, she said you’ll be fine.

When I failed an exam I’d been quietly dreading, she made me a cup of tea, sat down opposite me, and said you’ll be fine.

She was right almost every time.

And I’ve spent a good portion of my adult life trying to work out what exactly she knew that the rest of us are still catching up to.

What she didn’t have

She didn’t have a framework.

She didn’t have a language for attachment styles or emotional regulation or the importance of validating a child’s inner experience.

She hadn’t read anything about the long-term effects of authoritarian versus permissive parenting.

She would have looked at you blankly if you’d used the phrase “gentle parenting,” not because she was unkind, but because the whole idea of parenting as something you studied and optimised would have struck her as slightly absurd.

You had children.

You fed them, kept them warm, loved them in the way that was available to you, and trusted that they were more resilient than they looked.

That was the operating manual.

I’m not saying it was perfect.

There were things I needed at ten or twelve or fifteen that she didn’t know how to give me, and a few of those gaps took me well into adulthood to properly understand.

But here’s what I keep coming back to: she wasn’t wrong about the resilience part.

The terrifying competence of women who just got on with it

My mother could make a meal out of almost nothing.

Not in a romantic, artisanal sense — in the sense that there wasn’t always a lot in the cupboard and something hot still appeared on the table at six o’clock.

She kept the house running, kept us in clean clothes, knew which of us was struggling before we knew it ourselves, and did all of this without making a production of it.

No one was thanking her.

No one was tracking her workload or acknowledging the cognitive load of running a household of six on a factory worker’s wage.

She just did it, the way her mother had done it, because that was what was required.

I think about that now when I hear the word “burnout.”

Not dismissively — burnout is real and I’ve seen it up close in people I care about.

But I do wonder sometimes what my mother would make of the gap between how much she carried and how little of it she named as a burden.

Whether that was strength or suppression is probably a question with no clean answer.

You’ll be fine — what she actually meant

I used to think “you’ll be fine” was a dismissal.

A way of moving the conversation along before it got uncomfortable.

What I understand now, having spent thirty years watching people navigate difficulty at work and at home, is that it was something closer to a vote of confidence.

She wasn’t saying your problem doesn’t matter.

She was saying I have looked at you, and I know what you’re made of, and I am not worried.

That’s a different thing entirely.

There’s a version of modern parenting — and I say this carefully, because I think it comes from a good place — that hovers so close to a child’s distress that it accidentally communicates the opposite message.

That the child isn’t capable.

That the feeling is too big to be survived without a parent’s immediate intervention.

My mother didn’t do that.

She let us feel the thing and then watched us find our way out of it.

Most of the time, we did.

What she got right without knowing the research

I’ve read enough in retirement — psychology, memoirs, books about how people change — to recognise what my mother was doing intuitively.

She was building what researchers would now call self-efficacy.

The quiet internal belief that when something hard happens, you will be able to handle it.

Not because someone will fix it for you.

Because you’ve handled hard things before and the evidence is starting to accumulate.

She was also, without using the word, consistent.

The meals were there.

The routine was there.

The house ran the same way on good weeks and bad ones, and that steadiness was its own kind of reassurance.

Children don’t need everything to be perfect.

They need to know what to expect.

She understood that before anyone wrote it down.

The things she couldn’t give

I want to be honest about this part, because I think nostalgia can do a disservice if you let it.

My mother wasn’t emotionally available in the way I now understand that phrase to mean.

If I was struggling with something internal — something that didn’t have a visible injury or a fixable cause — she didn’t really have the tools for it.

Feelings were acknowledged briefly and then the conversation moved on.

You didn’t dwell.

Dwelling was considered, in that household and in that era, to be a kind of self-indulgence.

I carried that with me longer than I should have.

My wife Linda would tell you it took me the better part of our marriage to learn how to actually sit with something difficult rather than immediately trying to fix it or move past it.

She’d be right.

That’s not entirely my mother’s fault — I’m a grown man who made his own choices — but the wiring started somewhere.

What I took and what I left behind

When my own boys were growing up I tried to keep some of what my mother had and build in what she didn’t.

I kept the consistency.

The meals, the routines, the sense that the house ran steadily regardless of what was happening in the world outside it.

I kept the belief in their resilience, even when it was hard to watch them struggle.

I tried — not always successfully — to add the thing she couldn’t quite offer.

The willingness to sit down and ask how they were really doing, and then wait for the real answer.

I didn’t always manage it.

There were years when work was demanding and I was tired in a way that looked a lot like my mother’s version of just getting on with it.

But I knew what I was aiming for, which is more than she had.

What she taught me without meaning to

My mother died eleven years ago.

I think about her often, more than I expected to, in the way you think about people whose influence you’re still discovering long after they’re gone.

She didn’t raise us according to a theory.

She raised us according to what she knew, which was that life was going to be hard and the best thing she could do was make sure we could meet it.

You’ll be fine.

Said a thousand times, in a kitchen that smelled of whatever was on the stove, by a woman who had very little and gave a great deal and never once suggested that either of those things was remarkable.

She was right about the resilience.

I’m still working on the rest.

 

What is Your Inner Child's Artist Type?

Knowing your inner child’s artist type can be deeply beneficial on several levels, because it reconnects you with the spontaneous, unfiltered part of yourself that first experienced creativity before rules, expectations, or external judgments came in. This 90-second quiz reveals your unique creative blueprint—the way your inner child naturally expresses joy, imagination, and originality. In just a couple of clicks, you’ll uncover the hidden strengths that make you most alive… and learn how to reignite that spark right now.

 
    Print
    Share
    Pin